support the idea

[Nam-Ky Nguyen]

Collin has raised a very interesting question. My view
is that  we only need a small database of BIBD. Among
non-BIBD I wonder whether it makes much difference if
the experimenter who need a 2-resolvable IBD of size
(v,k,r)=(21,6,10) uses an RGD in
http://www.designcomputing.net/gendex/bib/b10.html
with E=0.8733 (99.97% of the upper bound) or another
one she generates with with E=0.8735 or E=0.8730).

http://www.designcomputing.net/gendex/bib/b10.html
--- collin.carbno at sasktel.sk.ca wrote:
> I think the database of designs with statistical
> properties is a worthwhile
> activity.  How many designs are there to a  given
> size?  Any thoughts on
> range of designs to be cataloged.  Are we talking
> hundreds, thousands,
> millions, or billions of designs? What is your
> cutoff point?
> 
>  Good luck on the project.     Something that would
> be useful.

=====
Nam-Ky Nguyen, Ph.D.
Design Computing
email: nkn at designcomputing.net 
web:   www.designcomputing.net