<n> versus <i>

[Leonard Soicher]

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 01:50:36PM +0100, Peter Dobcsanyi wrote:

[...]

> 
> Agreed. In fact, one of my "choices" was:
> 
> > Peter Dobcsanyi wrote:
> > >    - use <i> or <n> in <image> in a way which reflects the
> > >      semantics of the particular function more precisely.
> 
> That means that (currently) we should not use <i> at all.

Agreed. I have changed my GAP Writer accordingly.

> 
> I just wanted to point out the inconsistency in the current use of <i>
> and <n>. Dropping (the use of) <i> until a very good reason arises for
> re-introducing it is equally fine with me.
> 

OK with me too.

Regards,   Leonard