<resolutions>

[Peter Cameron]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:11:25PM +0100, Leonard Soicher wrote:
> I propose we add the following compulsory attributes to the <resolutions> tag:
> 
>     attribute pairwise_nonisomorphic { xsd:boolean | "unknown" } ,
>     attribute all_classes_represented { xsd:boolean | "unknown" } 
> 
Agreed.
> 
> In the ext-rep a resolution is given as a function on block indices.
> Should be order our resolutions? If so, how?
> Clearly one should never list the same resolution more than once.
>
This opens a larger can of works. Should a list of designs containing
no pairwise isomorphic designs be ordered? In theory, yes, and the
obvious way to do it is to take the lexicographically least element
in each isomorphism class and order these by the usual rules. But that
is a fair amount of work...
 
Peter.