"binary_block_design"

[Leonard Soicher]

Peter D wrote:

>
>I was editing the "List of block designs" section in the doc and ...
>
>Just to make the situation absolutely clear, shouldn't we use
>"binary_block_design" for design type instead of "block_design"?
>

I don't think so. 

For now, block_design means binary_block_design. In the future, 
if we decide to handle the not necessarily binary case then
I expect we will add (backwards compatible) complications to 
the block_design structure in order to handle the general 
case. 

Leonard